
Posted by NoToRiOuS at 23:10 9/1/2003.
Not really CS news, but I'm sure gamers will be interested. Basically, Nvidia will be releasing their latest graphic card incarnation around the 22nd of January. However, it is not for the shallow pocketed members of the community, weighing in at around $700 USD...That's approximately £466!!!For the more techy minded of us, the FX will have 256MB of DDR-II SD Ram. (That's 2nd Generation DDR ram) The GPU (Graphics Processing Unit) will be running at 500mhz with the ram at 1000mhz. See this link.
Initial benchmarks done by Maximum PC suggest that in Quake III running at 1600x1200, 32-bit colour and 2x anti-aliasing, the GeForce FX is about 40% faster than the ATI Radeon 9700 Pro.
Sounds like the GeForce FX 5800 Ultra is the mutt's nuts. So what does this mean for us the consumer? Personally, I am hoping ATI and Nvidia will start a pricing war and slash the cost of their non flagship cards.
Comments
Page: 1 2
Croydon
23:12 9/1/2003
23:12 9/1/2003
2 COOL 4 SKOOL
UKTerrorist
23:13 9/1/2003
23:20 9/1/2003
23:23 9/1/2003
23:27 9/1/2003
23:31 9/1/2003
23:34 9/1/2003
LoB [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Saviour of UKT
UKTerrorist
23:35 9/1/2003
Last Chance
23:39 9/1/2003
doom3 anyone [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
23:40 9/1/2003
Croydon
23:40 9/1/2003
Theres prob a game beginning development now that will need gf fx power [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Last Chance
23:42 9/1/2003
23:44 9/1/2003
23:58 9/1/2003
theb0g
00:04 10/1/2003
personally i think the fx being released now is just to show ATi, that nvidia is the best gpu processor there is [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
00:11 10/1/2003
00:11 10/1/2003
00:20 10/1/2003
ive seen guides how to make radeon 9500 into a radeon 9700 pro sooo i might look into that a bit more, the 9500 is around £130 :| [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
theb0g
00:21 10/1/2003
i wouldnt go the other way and using a soldering iron tho :) [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Saviour of UKT
UKTerrorist
00:34 10/1/2003
Editor
UKTerrorist
00:34 10/1/2003
theb0g
00:35 10/1/2003
Clan ONE
00:53 10/1/2003
01:34 10/1/2003
Aside from the poor joke, I say this type of thing time and time again when people moan about what headphones should I get when they've got a poor soundcard. I take it your monitor is in fairly good condition and isn't too dated? Simple things like, "do you have the latest drivers" probably don't need mentioning but other drivers such as via 4in1 etc do also help improve fps.
Try running 3d mark 2001 SE and post back with your score, if you've recently installed dx9 then, no offence intended, your a fool because that card doesn't support it. In fact no one should install dx9 unless their card supports it because it will only lower your cards performance and cannot be uninstalled unless you format. I made that mistake and lost 3000 pts on 3dmark when I installed it. I've got a GF4Ti4200 OTES and I get bout 12000 pts on 3d mark and 99fps constant with vsync on in 800x600. If your monitor is poor and you are running vsync on then that's the answer there. Install Riva Tuner from guru3d.com and check your clock speeds also. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
01:38 10/1/2003
its *considerably* faster than *anything* on the market at the moment, therefore, I would say its as much of a necessary purchase as the GF3 was back when that came out 2 years ago.
Its ground breaking technology, and yes, I still run an original GF3, which is almost 2 years old now... it copes with everything I throw at it, so, expect the GF FX to last you a couple of years if you aren't so obsessed with having the latest products, just to waste your money, when there is so little performance gain... :P [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
01:41 10/1/2003
01:43 10/1/2003
g30rg3h
UKTerrorist
01:46 10/1/2003
g30rg3h
UKTerrorist
01:48 10/1/2003
01:58 10/1/2003
Lord of t3h b0ys
UKTerrorist
02:16 10/1/2003
Turn V-sync off. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
02:25 10/1/2003
08:23 10/1/2003
so they just choose the ones that will whooop competition [ati 9700 pro]
so its proly about 4% better ;P [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
ctx
08:24 10/1/2003
Head CS Server Admin
UKTerrorist
09:05 10/1/2003
I'll look forward to buying 1 of these gfx cards in 3 years time when there's a game out that actually needs its power to run. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
09:06 10/1/2003
conneXion
09:37 10/1/2003
10:17 10/1/2003
10:36 10/1/2003
wonder why? [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
10:37 10/1/2003
11:06 10/1/2003
11:08 10/1/2003
Disturbed
11:08 10/1/2003
11:09 10/1/2003
Most P4 mobos are Intel. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
11:15 10/1/2003
Don't forget that RRPs mean s*** all, and hardware stores sell them considerably under that price (Radeon 9700 Pro RRP is still supposedly £350, yet they are all around £280 if you cba looking) [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
11:15 10/1/2003
11:19 10/1/2003
11:29 10/1/2003
haha owned, but your used to it by now [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
eSports.Edge
11:50 10/1/2003
theb0g
11:55 10/1/2003
id expect doom3 to run around 45-60fps with a amd xp2400 and radeon 9700 in 1024x768 [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
12:09 10/1/2003
Then again, if i had the money i would probs buy a FX card. But i dont so i wont
Infinity-eSports
12:12 10/1/2003
I suppose thats the alpha playtest, maybe the final version wont be as fps consuming! Don't get your hopes up tho, I expect you'll need a XP2600, GF4ti4600 or radeon9700 at least to get anywhere near playable rates with any of the cooler features turned on [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
12:14 10/1/2003
12:46 10/1/2003
Comparing framerates on Doom 3 Alpha is a complete waste of time. The code is unoptomised and in an early form whilst the graphics are in their high poly state. If it doesnt run on the new ATi cards at more than 10 fps who is going to actually buy it? [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
12:46 10/1/2003
Yeah, but you're still not going to be able to run it at any amazing resolution, with any decent amount of FPS.... :P [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
12:52 10/1/2003
13:24 10/1/2003
13:44 10/1/2003
eh Lithium? [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
2 COOL 4 SKOOL
UKTerrorist
13:54 10/1/2003
w00p w00p
did say something like euro -> usd coversation being right then my price would be right. but u never know with these yanks do ya eh? oracle :P [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Rush!
14:05 10/1/2003
14:12 10/1/2003
14:15 10/1/2003
its gonna be far more than a direct conversion from $ to £, we live in the uk so as usual they will probably take the p*** and slap an extra 20% or so on top of the US price, for no justifiable reason [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
theb0g
15:31 10/1/2003
Basically although VAC is a good thing its the reason fps in cs has died, the more they add the worse your fps gets.
I remember the days when my pc got 100 fps with a gf 2 mx. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Disturbed
16:04 10/1/2003
Game2XS.Monkey Magic
16:07 10/1/2003
16:08 10/1/2003
16:22 10/1/2003
Head CS Server Admin
UKTerrorist
16:24 10/1/2003
17:08 10/1/2003
Wonder what I should do with my GF4 Ti4600 [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
17:29 10/1/2003
BTW, graphics cards always, always come out at £350 RRP over here. Always. Radeons, Geforces, Matroxes... always have. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Saviour of UKT
UKTerrorist
17:33 10/1/2003
Rush!
18:21 10/1/2003
theb0g
18:34 10/1/2003
theb0g
18:43 10/1/2003
19:00 10/1/2003
00:58 11/1/2003
01:11 11/1/2003
02:53 11/1/2003
02:56 11/1/2003
that way they get all the market. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Page: 1 2