
The AWP is the topic of one of the more frequent debates among the Counter-Strike community. This 'one-shot one-kill' sniper rifle has its fans but at the same time is probably the most hated weapon in the game. The AWP is probably the best sniper rifle in the CS armoury, with a double-zoom function, allowing you to pick off your enemies with the comfort of great distance between you and those machine gun toting loonies....
In the latest release of Counter-Strike, V1.1, the AWP power was tweaked so that only a head or torso shot now kills with one bullet. Players can, however, still only take 2 shots to the leg before they drop to the floor. The sniper crosshair was also removed when the AWP is zoomed out, but thats fair enough and this article isn't gonna get into that part of it, basically cos its a fair ammendment.
Onto the real debate.......is the awp lame? (One shot one kill cant be right? can it?) or is it a credit to a players skills when he can use it effectively (you think you could master it?). In my opinion (the whole article is my opinion, dont hate me!), the AWP is a gun of skill, not just a 'n00bie' gun for any people that cant play CS 'properly'.
Sure, its a one shot kill weapon, but that means nothing to me, a headshot from an ak47 can hurt almost as much and I've no complaints about that. CS has tried to capture some elements of realism (a whole 'nother debate!) , while still trying to keep the game just that...a game. Sniping is a massive part of counter-strike and helps to achieve some of that 'realism' we all love. Sniping in CS adds a whole new dimension to the game, it prevents people from purely rushing in for a war, if they know theres an AWP bullet round the next corner, with their name etched on it.
Even when I'm not the one behind the scope, I love the buzz (sad maybe) I get from knowing there's a guy zoomed in around my area, and then having to battle, move swiftly and throw some damn smoke grens to get into some sort of close quarters batle (CQB). One of the reasons people accepted smoke grenades so easily was because of the potential for battling with snipers, and i agree they're a good way to even the fight. But, in my opinion, to weaken the AWP further was a slight mistake. Possibly even better is a sniper vs sniper contest, both players knowing that one foot too far in the wrong direction, and death is imminent, yet they still have to put their neck out, to get that shot in before their opponent. Unlike other situations, with the AWP they cant just hop about the place and get in close to the sniper.
Sure we get so called 'AWP whores' who, if they can afford it, try to buy an AWP each round.....but that's just their style and probably one of the reasons they enjoy CS. I like sniping, not as much as CQB, but i like it alot. I'm by no means a 'whore', but I do appreciate how tricky the AWP can be......especially if enemies do manage to slip by your initial efforts, and get slightly closer. You need lots of composure, skill and good aiming to take them out under those circumstances. Is there anything wrong with being an AWP whore? Don't most ppl buy the same gun each time they die? (if they have the money ie colt)
A lot of people who moan about AWP'ers actually can't use the weapon that well, and may feel slightly aggrieved that someone else can put it to such good effect. But in this case, this gives them even more reason to respect the more than capable sniper. Although, I'm not saying there aren't great snipers who just dont use it, cos they don't like to.....it's their prerogative. Initially, I was utter crap with the AWP (admittedly being an HPB didn't help me learn), but after a couple of beta releases of slow but sure practice, i became more efficient, developed my aim, developed my own movement....meaning learning when to push forward with my AWP and more so, when to retreat to a safer distance to continue my battle. It was, however, by no means an easy gun to use at that stage, and only now do I feel competent with an AWP in my paws. There's so much more to an AWP round that some people accept.
Often a good sniper can turn a game in a round or two. If his team are being rushed constantly, and consequently whipped by their enemies, shouldn't he pull out the AWP and put a slight cog in the works of the opposing team? Especially so if he happens to a damn fine sniper.
There are always going to be people for and against the AWP, so this article by no means represents anyone's view, other than my own. If anyone actually reads this and disagrees, keep your flaming constructive at least......or I'l get 'whoring' all over your machine gun little asses!
Comments
Page: 1 2 3 4
Founder
UKTerrorist
18:58 12/4/2001
Editor
UKTerrorist
19:00 12/4/2001
19:22 12/4/2001
19:24 12/4/2001
i think u all will agree...... as for the article itself. yes i agree.. awp can be a gun of skill (end comment)
bl1nd
http://cslogo.ukterrorist.com/bl1nd/ [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Editor
UKTerrorist
19:28 12/4/2001
i dunno really, still undecided to be honest. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Editor
UKTerrorist
19:29 12/4/2001
Croydon
19:59 12/4/2001
However, in all honesty who can resist having a go at some1 who kills you? Its almost as unimaginable as not being alowed to curse lpbs for..er..being lpbs!
Therefore in accordance with DeC's laws, i forbid the use of the AWP to all except those on my team who r skillful. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
22:01 12/4/2001
-DG [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
22:16 12/4/2001
It also promotes camping because joe-camper knows that he can find himself a nice spot and 'click the mouse' somewhere on the body of some approaching player.
You all to often get (in my experience) a AWP camper from each team as the only survivors, both camping away, whilst everyone else twiddles their thumbs and waits for the timer to run out. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
22:35 12/4/2001
Anyway if you have any skill you'd joy at the opportunity to fight one with an awm, run toward them, evade their shots, and knife the SOB to death. Maybe even knife his corpse to rub it in.
22:37 12/4/2001
22:45 12/4/2001
1- If you make yourself an easy target (ie. straight line runner) you deserve to eat that bullet
2-With a combination of grenades, the right route, and some skill, snipers are easily defeated.
3- If you know there's a sniper somewhere, and you go out of your way to kill him...and die... it's your own fault...sure it only took 1 shot... but hey... you missed with 29.5 of yours.
I think that the sniper rifles(except scout, due to low cost) should be as powerfull as the awp used to be (well maybe the semi's a little weaker) because as is the awp is almost at a disadvantage at longrange to a few people with aug's. At long range, Sniper rifles should rule... Period [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
22:45 12/4/2001
22:47 12/4/2001
22:47 12/4/2001
22:48 12/4/2001
22:52 12/4/2001
SUCK IT UP AND KNIFE THE AWP WHORE, QUIT WHINING
(to all the anti-awp whiners) I can't use the damn thing either, but it's just another good reason to gun 'em down when they poke their little heads out; or sneak up and stab 'em in the back. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
22:54 12/4/2001
22:55 12/4/2001
23:01 12/4/2001
I used to love Quake3, play it all the time. Then I played CS and now I can't play Quake3 anymore. If you just want a PsychoRunAroundFiringAtMaxRate game, you should play Quake. I like CS because it incorporates tactics, such as sniping with the awm/p or ambushing people from a good hiding spot.
I'm a mediocre player of CS, and I don't get killed more than once a round by an "awpwhore." In fact, at a distance, I've sometimes been able to take out an "awpwhore" with my trusty Deagle. The awm/p takes skill, and yes a n00b might get lucky every once in a while (same as if he was using an m4a1), but only the truly good players can put a sniper to efficient use all the time (I'm not one of those, I buy an awm/p maybe once out of every 100 rounds, I prefer to snipe with the sig or the aug).
Yes, CS is supposed to be "more realistic" than other FPS. Yes, in "real life" (whatever that is) even with a kevlar jacket you can get turfed by a single shot to the body. I love that about CS. So go play Quake3 or qwitcherb***hin. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
23:04 12/4/2001
1. Buy an AWP and show him whos boss
2. suck it up and kill him w/ a tmp from afar an embarass the s*** out of him
AWPs are an integral part of the game, and last , on another topic, why do dumbasses always whine when a new cs comes out? If u dont like it, DONT PLAY IT!im sick of people always whining about bugs, if u dont like it , play dod, tfc, flf, or firearns for a good time.
-FlyGuy
I'll back up any of my claims in a game, email me and i'll show you. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
23:05 12/4/2001
23:05 12/4/2001
23:15 12/4/2001
The only reason for the awp that I can see is the one mentioned at the start of the article. It stops CS from turning into a Deathmatch. I meen who can honestly say they are not scared of an awp? Anyway, the one thing I CAN'T agree with in the article is when he says that the one-shot-kill adds realism. OK, lemme get a Mac-10 and put a round in you chest. Try to tell me that won't kill/cripple you.
Oh and by the way, I never awp, as a mater of pride. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
23:33 12/4/2001
When I have never used to awp when i was a newb i bought it to try it out... killed one... another... another... another my stats rose from 2-13 to 8-14!!! I WAS A DAMN NEWB!!! i HATE AWP WHORES!!!!!!!!!! ITS S NO SKILL GUN!!!! 100% ACCURATE!!!!!!!! U GUYS SUK!!!!!!!!! [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
01:31 13/4/2001
I absolutely love CS, its a fabulous game.
Flawless and realistic its not. The controversy over the awm/p is a just one. Have any of you hunted? Do most of you pro awpers know how difficult it is to simply hit a target standing completely still is? Much less a target which poses a threat. Combine that with trying to strafe.
That is almost completely impossible. I dont care who you are, Navy SEAL or not thats an incredible task in which a very very small percentage of even the special forces could accomplish. Most snipers remain motionless for hours on end with thier weapons perfectly balanced on tri-pods. The power from a absolute one shot kill weapon would have to incredible, which translates into unreliable shooting at the least standing up. The interesting thing is in CS from mid to long distance its a very simple task ( not to say that the awp is skilless, CQB with the weapon is difficult) but lets face it, most "Whores" use the awm and only the awm and remain in the same spot distant from action, making it incredibly easy for them. At a distance its simply point and click. Theres no compensation for recoil, theres two zoom magnifications. I mean come on. Anyhit center mass and your opponents toast. If I can get shot in the face and keep fighting, I can get hit in the shoulder or the hip and sqeeze off some rounds. The gun simply is unrealistically easy to use. Keep the power if you want but at least make them duck when they shoot it. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
01:45 13/4/2001
In my opinion the weapon is not too powerful if the player uses it responsible. I think everybody knows the feeling when you've just missed your first shot with your awp and that colt b***h running towards you keeps on firing and firing...
02:20 13/4/2001
I think it is a fair weapon also because of the cost. Sure, a "whore" might kill you one or two rounds, but then you get the satisfaction of killing him ( he loses $4500) and possibly stealing his awp. Then, to really p*** him off, spray your logo on his dead carcas and shoot the awp in the sky. You have to remember that this is a game, but you can still make people mad when you steal what they paid for =).
[Dr.S]Green Eggs and Ham
//Disregard any spelling mistakes want to play cs now!!!! [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
02:33 13/4/2001
get rid of awp and add a silenced rifle that is a little be stronger than scout. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
02:44 13/4/2001
02:48 13/4/2001
the reason? cause this is a gun that uses amunition that could shoot down a light plane. can you imagine what happens to your leg when you cop an awp round in the thigh? it disapears. you wind up with a bleeding stump attached to your hips. sure - that doesn't mean definate death, but it's certainly enough to take someone out of action in game terms... [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
03:15 13/4/2001
"You lame F4GOT YOU KILLED ME!!! ALL PEOPLE THAT USE THAT GUN ARE LAME (Notice the indirect reference to gun, no need to be specific, keeps the insult reusable) AND SO ARE PEOPLE WHO JUMP AND USE FLASHES YOU CHEETER F4GOT WHORE WALLHACKING ASSLIVER!!!!!!!"
In other words, nice shot!
Oops forgot to throw in the ole autoaim comment in my whining.
//Feel free to use my "Ever Reusable CS Whine" Tm.
//As long as you keep this statement intact. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
03:16 13/4/2001
Every time I see someone with an AWP, I think to myself "he's either going to cover me, or he's going to hole up somewhere, watch me get shot in the back, and then shoot the guy who got me". Too many folks with AWP's are just in it for the kill ratio, not for the team. T's with awp's camp in sight of the bomb and let time run out. CT's with awp's camp after the bomb's been planted and they should be trying to defuse.
The problem isn't the awp. It's the personality of a lot (not all) of the deathmatch-oriented crowd that uses it.
Of course, that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
03:27 13/4/2001
GO SCOUT AND TMP! <-two favorite guns [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
04:16 13/4/2001
04:16 13/4/2001
04:17 13/4/2001
05:06 13/4/2001
05:08 13/4/2001
-WoNeD [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
05:31 13/4/2001
Don't get me wrong, if AWP and scout were the same price, I'd go for the AWP any day. Problem is, it is arse-easier to buy a scout every round, and still have money to stock up on grenades, armor, and still have some cash for retirement (or in this case, in a piggy bank as insurance for afterlife).
Anyway, I think a scout user, while not being able to beat an AWPer in a 1 on 1 stand down 100% of the time, *CAN* hold his own.
Two things to remember:
1) Accuracy: Scout is 100% accurate both zoomed/unzoomed (takes some practice without zoom), and will hit the center if you're at walking speed or slower (opposed to AWP where you *MUST* be stock still if you want to hit anything but sky). It means strafe-snipers will find the scout a lot more lenient. Also, when running full tilt rarely goes more than half an inch away from the crosshair, and when jumping, more often than not, the bullet goes directly below the crosshair. No clue why, but it does happen. Try it and see.
2) Speed: The scout has the fastest running speed in the whole game (right up there with knife and grenades), and when zoomed, you can still run as fast as people carrying MP5s. What does this mean? Easy, Pop around the corner for a split sec, see where an enemy is, zoom in from behind cover, then strafe out and hit him, then run back. You don't even need to switch back to the pistol after the shot to run, because Scout gives you top-notch mobility. In fact, scout actually has the best damage/time exposed ratios for standoffs.
BTW, Last time I checked, I was #46 on a local league, with about 25% of my frags being scout frags (I suspect its a lot higher - after popping a guy with a scout I pull out my pistol and frag him).
Its a laugh to see the stats for the League... there you have all the d00ds with AWP, AK, Carbine, MP5, etc as the favourite gun, and all of a sudden there's a scout nestled there at 46. Probably makes people scratch their heads.
T: So I'm a fool. CS isn't all *THAT* realistic anyway in regards to weapons. The Glock 18c in real life has only 19 bullets in the clip. In CS it has twenty. So bite me. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
05:44 13/4/2001
06:10 13/4/2001
06:41 13/4/2001
Secondly, It is true that AWP can be lame
(a la camping in siege carpark by the dumpster)
but that is the way that 'newbies' must use it.
One thing that I count as skill (mebbe it's just me) is being able to AWP assault. (Check out C3K's K-Sharp. There is a demo of him floating around.)
The arguement that AWPers are campers is made void by this fighting style, and it also adds a degree of movement, aim and intelligence/logistics.
Anyway, if you're in melbourne, go to darkside.ausgamers.com and witness the true power. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
07:26 13/4/2001
And if you're going to make the gun kill you when you get shot in the foot, then why not make all the games as 'realistically' deadly as they should be? I mean, would you rather be playing Rogue Spear or something? Where, in all reality, a round from a Colt or AK47 is at LEAST going to knock you on your ass.
I just think that to make a gun that's as damaging as the AWP (I've shot through a door and killed two people in one shot), you're unbalancing the damage model of the game. Sure, it might take some skill to use, and sure, it's fun to have to sneak around a bit. But the AWP almost goes round a bout from discouraging 'Quake play' to encouraging 'llama camp'. Llama camp being a situation where the terrorist WITH THE f***ING BOMB will sit and camp when he's the last one left on the team. Complete your goddamn objectives. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
08:35 13/4/2001
But why on earth did the take the short range sight off the assault sniper rifle *the bottom one that no one buys cos it's the most expensive and takes 6 shots to kill anyhow* I mean that gun is now useless no one ever did use it much but now it seems they wasted thare time codeing it in cos it has no short range corshair???.
Which is a shame cos it could have been that weapons time to shine cos it realy does take pure skill to snipe with and it's not a good assault rifle at best but if you combine the 2 it could have been a good weapon in 1.1. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
09:27 13/4/2001
09:28 13/4/2001
10:55 13/4/2001
I think if we saw guns like this, and other guns that seem to be there purely for eyecandy (ie - half the pistols, the tmp ,mac10, new sig sniper) play an important *different* role in the game, it would improve thing drastically. Concentration should be on moving the debate away from the awp "whoring" and onto how it can be beaten, by putting those "cosmetic" weapons to use. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
12:02 13/4/2001
Anyway, of all the weapons in CS, the AWM has to be the most unbalanced. If anybody remembers Beta4 of CS, the AWM took a considerable time to operate the bolt and chamber the next round. THAT was balanced. What is unbalanced is having the ability to kill a player in one shot every second, which is the type of opportunity the AWM gives. If they want to balance the AWP, then let them lengthen the time it takes to fire off a round. I myself definitely prefer the Steyr Scout; that's a weapon that truly needs skill to use. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
12:09 13/4/2001
12:23 13/4/2001
12:31 13/4/2001
12:34 13/4/2001
12:38 13/4/2001
12:59 13/4/2001
13:11 13/4/2001
personally, I prefer to sneak about in the shadows and tmp their legs, just for that humiliating effect.
13:44 13/4/2001
14:02 13/4/2001
Those who can get multiple clean shots in a round, while the opponent is jumping around trying to dodge bullets, get their kills mostly because they're skilled. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
14:53 13/4/2001
Would real terrorists snipe with a gun that if it doesnt kill in one shot they will lose hostages lifes.
Would CTs never have snipers guarding the exits the Ts could come from
What game could survive without instant death from a distance
The awp is not a newbie gun, if used well they can pin down a squad of enemys, if used wrongly he is another easy kill, off by centimetres and he will die he is one shot kill but miss one shot and be killed. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
15:08 13/4/2001
http://www.accuracyinternational.com/awp.htm [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
15:11 13/4/2001
http://www.accuracyinternational.com/awp.htm [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
15:20 13/4/2001
I think it does add a level of skill training in the game for the person on the receiving end; If he can pick off an AWPer hiding across the map, that's just added skill points for him. He got that much better by killing the fag. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
15:24 13/4/2001
Awp is WAYYY too powerful... they tweaked it in 1.1, which was excellent, but they need to tweak it more, it´s still too powerful.
A shot in the torso should take about... let´s say: 65 health NO MORE.
Head shot should of course be a one shot kill!!!
I have no respect WHAT SO EVER for the wh0rez, and never will...
When I was a newbie, I used too camp, but now I see how unfair it is... so I´ve stopped!
Get the AWP out of CS... v. 1.2 would be PERFECT if they REMOvED the AWP...
PEACE!!! [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
15:28 13/4/2001
16:16 13/4/2001
16:42 13/4/2001
187 - An Army of One signing off...
Over & out... [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
17:02 13/4/2001
17:16 13/4/2001
But the AWM... hmmzz, I'm just not good enuf at it. But I sure as hell love doging AWM bullets ,if there's anything in CS that gets me tensed up it's that! (Don't forget those grens guys!)
I think the power of the AWM is PERFECT how it is now, maybe a bit to weak. But I really used to dislike AWM Rushers, right now, those are non-existant
Anywayz, I agree when ppl say it's a weapon that takes skill. And not more/less skill then a storming maniac would have... And I encourage any1 who is a great sniper to just Ignore those newB remarks of ppl who can't stand getting sniped.
Grtz,
WidowMaker [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
17:16 13/4/2001
But the AWM... hmmzz, I'm just not good enuf at it. But I sure as hell love doging AWM bullets ,if there's anything in CS that gets me tensed up it's that! (Don't forget those grens guys!)
I think the power of the AWM is PERFECT how it is now, maybe a bit to weak. But I really used to dislike AWM Rushers, right now, those are non-existant
Anywayz, I agree when ppl say it's a weapon that takes skill. And not more/less skill then a storming maniac would have... And I encourage any1 who is a great sniper to just Ignore those newB remarks of ppl who can't stand getting sniped.
Grtz,
WidowMaker [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
17:37 13/4/2001
But the AWM... hmmzz, I'm just not good enuf at it. But I sure as hell love doging AWM bullets ,if there's anything in CS that gets me tensed up it's that! (Don't forget those grens guys!)
I think the power of the AWM is PERFECT how it is now, maybe a bit to weak. But I really used to dislike AWM Rushers, right now, those are non-existant
Anywayz, I agree when ppl say it's a weapon that takes skill. And not more/less skill then a storming maniac would have... And I encourage any1 who is a great sniper to just Ignore those newB remarks of ppl who can't stand getting sniped.
Grtz,
WidowMaker [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
17:44 13/4/2001
18:08 13/4/2001
Peace [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
18:11 13/4/2001
18:32 13/4/2001
19:32 13/4/2001
I'm enjoying CQB and I don't buy AWP often because I can't use it fast enough. Being a pro AWP'er needs lots of practice. I don't think it is a gun for babies.
Midnight destroyer "Nocturne". Fell the rythim of m4a1. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
19:58 13/4/2001
What seriously ruins a game for me more than all them awp ‘whores’ is the superduperlowlaggers, who I think deserve more of a debate than the awp. And by this I mean pings in the region 0-50. How many times have you emptied whole clips in his flippin brains before dying and not having caused ANY damage? I don’t know about the technical point of view, but can’t you set up ‘56k-ers only’ and ‘broadband-ers only’ servers? Let me know if such a thing is not possible.
And one more thing…I don’t know what the hell some people r on about when they say “I’ve stopped using the awp since 1.1”. I think having taken off the one-shot-kills for the legs hardly makes any difference if yer good enough. [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
20:46 13/4/2001
20:59 13/4/2001
i think that the AWP is a well balenced weapon i use myself if i have spare cash and everybody gets a great feeling when the oppositions AWP user is taken out by another talented sniper and it was YOU how backed them up! [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
21:07 13/4/2001
are you sure u dont mean spanner?
21:21 13/4/2001
// [GoB]SwitcH [ Comment: Report | IP: Logged ]
Page: 1 2 3 4